Montana Bail Laws
- Applicable
Statutes.
- MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 46.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 9. BAIL PART 5. CONDITIONS OF BAIL -- VIOLATION
THEREOF.
- Licensing
Requirements for Agents.
*** Montana’s statutes
currently do not contain regulations for regarding the licensing of bail bond
recovery or bail enforcement agents. The closest equivalent in the MT statutes
are the provisions dealing with licensing of a "surety." ***
- MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 33.
INSURANCE AND INSURANCE COMPANIES CHAPTER 17. INSURANCE PRODUCERS,
ADJUSTERS, CONSULTANTS, AND ADMINISTRATORS PART 12. INSURANCE PRODUCER AND
CONSULTANT CONTINUING EDUCATION ACT 33-17-1203. Continuing education --
basic requirements – exceptions
· (a) a person licensed to act as an
insurance producer for property, casualty, surety, or title insurance or as a
consultant for general insurance shall, during each calendar year, complete at
least 10 credit hours of approved continuing education;
· (c) a person holding multiple
licenses shall, during each calendar year, complete at least 15 credit hours of
approved continuing education;
· (4) The minimum continuing education
requirements do not apply to:
- (e) a person
who only executes surety bail bonds
- Notice
of Forfeiture
- MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 46.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 9. BAIL PART 5. CONDITIONS OF BAIL -- VIOLATION
THEREOF 46-9-503. Violation of release condition – forfeiture
- (2) If a
defendant fails to appear before a court as required and bail has been
posted, the judge may declare the bail forfeited. Notice of the order of
forfeiture must be mailed to the defendant and the defendant's sureties at
their last-known address within 10 working days or the bond becomes void
and must be released and returned to the surety within 5 working days.
- Allotted
Time between Forfeiture Declaration and Payment Due Date.
- MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 46.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 9. BAIL PART 5. CONDITIONS OF BAIL -- VIOLATION
THEREOF 46-9-503. Violation of release condition – forfeiture
- (3) If at
any time within 90 days after the forfeiture the defendant's sureties
appear and satisfactorily excuse the defendant's failure to appear, the
judge may direct the forfeiture to be discharged upon terms as may be
just. If at any time within 90 days after the forfeiture the defendant
appears and satisfactorily excuses the defendant's failure to appear, the
judge shall direct the forfeiture to be discharged upon terms as may be
just.
- Forfeiture
Defenses.
- MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 46.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 9. BAIL PART 5. CONDITIONS OF BAIL -- VIOLATION
THEREOF 46-9-510. Surrender of defendant
· (1) At any time before the
forfeiture of bail:
· (a) the defendant may surrender to
the court or any peace officer of this state; or
· (b) the surety company may arrest
the defendant and surrender the defendant to the court or any peace officer of
this state.
· (2) The peace officer shall detain
the defendant in the officer's custody as upon commitment and shall file a
certificate, acknowledging the surrender, in the court having jurisdiction of
the defendant. The court may then order the bail exonerated.
- MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 46.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 9. BAIL PART 5. CONDITIONS OF BAIL -- VIOLATION
THEREOF 46-9-503. Violation of release condition – forfeiture
- (4) The
surety bail bond must be exonerated upon proof of the defendant's death or
incarceration or subjection to court-ordered treatment in a foreign
jurisdiction for a period exceeding the time limits under subsection (3).
- Remission.
- (No
specific provisions exist in the MT statutes at this time in regard to
"remission").
- Bail
Agent’s Arrest Authority.
- MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 46.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE-CHAPTER 9. BAIL PART 5. CONDITIONS OF BAIL -- VIOLATION
THEREOF 46-9-510. Surrender of defendant
- (b) the
surety company may arrest the defendant and surrender the defendant to the
court or any peace officer of this state.
- Other
Noteworthy Provisions.
- MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 46.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE- CHAPTER 9. BAIL PART 5. CONDITIONS OF BAIL --
VIOLATION THEREOF 46-9-502. Conditions performed -- bail discharged
- When the
conditions of bail have been performed and the accused has been discharged
from his obligations in the cause, the court shall return to him or his
sureties the deposit of any cash, stocks, or bonds. If the bail is real
estate, the court shall notify in writing the county clerk and recorder
and the lien of the bail bond on the real estate shall be discharged. If
the bail is a written undertaking or a commercial surety bond, it shall be
discharged and the sureties exonerated.
- Noteworthy
State Appellate Decisions.
- State
v. Neely
296 Mont. 557, 8 P.3d 121 (Table, Text in WESTLAW),
Unpublished Disposition, 1999, WL 589049, 1999 MT 183N
Mont.
Jul 28, 1999
- If
forfeiture is justified, the court's decision on the amount, if any, of the
forfeiture to be discharged must be based on consideration of six factors:
1. The willfulness of the
defendant's violation of bail conditions;
2. The surety's
participation in locating or apprehending the defendant;
3. The cost, inconvenience,
and prejudice suffered by the State because of the violation;
4. Any intangible costs;
5. The public interest in
ensuring the defendant's appearance; and
6. Any mitigating factors.
State v. Seybert (1987), 229 Mont. 183, 187, 745
P.2d 687, 689.
- In this
case, the first two factors suggest opposite results. Under the record,
there is nothing to indicate that Neely's violation of bail conditions was
anything but willful. Addressing factor 2, however, McFadden points out
that he located and produced Neely within days of Neely's failure to
appear in court.
· If the court finds that restitution
is appropriate, the court shall order restitution in an amount not exceeding
the amount of the victim's complaint or the amount of the victim's pecuniary
loss. McFadden asserts that the revocation hearing was related to a conviction
of drinking while driving, not the burglary conviction on which Neely owed
$1,245.91 in restitution. But as the State points out, the record reflects that
the court received bail because Neely violated probation on his burglary
conviction.
· Accordingly, the court did not act
improperly in ordering that the proceeds of bond forfeiture be used for
restitution.
· After reviewing the facts of this
case, we conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in
refusing to discharge the bail forfeiture. We affirm the decision of the
District Court.
B.
Siroky v. Richland County
271 Mont. 67, 894 P.2d 309
Mont.
Apr 25, 1995
- Owner of
cash bond used as bail deposit brought suit for conversion of interest
earned while bond was deposited with District Court before criminal
defendant was exonerated. The Seventh Judicial District Court, Richland County, Richard G. Phillips, J., entered summary judgment in favor of owner and
county appealed. The Supreme Court, Leaphart, J., held that bond remained
private property throughout criminal proceedings and, thus, county's
retention of interest would violate due process and takings clauses of State
Constitution.
Affirmed.
C.
City of Helena v. Buck
247 Mont. 313, 806 P.2d 27
Mont.
Feb 19, 1991
- Bail
bondsman sought to have forfeiture of bail discharged. The city court
refused to grant discharge. Bondsman filed appeal and alternative
application for writ of certiorari. The District Court, Lewis and Clark County , Thomas C. Honzel, J., dismissed appeal and alternative application. Bail
bondsman appealed. The Supreme Court, Turnage, C.J., held that: (1) there
was no right of appeal from city court show cause hearing on whether
forfeiture of bail should be discharged, and (2) certiorari was proper
remedy.
Affirmed in part, and reversed and remanded in part.
- Bounty
Hunter Provisions.
At this time,
there appear to be no specific regulations for "Bounty Hunters" in
the Montana statutes.